I have sat by casually amused by the recently completed US
election observing from the side lines what the two primary candidates were
saying, what the media were reporting and what friends and family have been
opining or posting. All the while trying to be detached because frankly, as I
am a Canadian citizen and unable to vote in the US, what influence could I
possibly have, or should have, on the outcome?
Now it is time for reflection.
Early on I could sense that Trump was going to appeal to a
lot of blue collar Americans, and not because they are “red necks”, or whatever
derogatory term one wishes to invoke, but because he was addressing real issues
that face the average person; their jobs or lack thereof, fear of terrorism on
their native soil, abuse of their basic rights by an uncaring government and a
long list of other grievances. As the Huffington Post wrote recently “People don't want to be told how to think
and they want to hear ideas that personally resonate” (http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/randall-craig/marketing-lessons-trump_b_12911648.html);
Trump did not tell Americans how to think and he gave them ideas that resonated.
Clinton failed on both counts. Did I think he would win? Honestly, since
emotion makes up such a high component of why a person votes the way they do, I
really had no idea
.
Do I think they made a good choice, actually yes. He is not
beholding to the political elite that his supporters were tired of. As the
leader of corporations whereby he had to keep a majority of shareholders
satisfied he knows what needs to be done. He may not have political experience
but that actually is a good thing as far too many politicians pander to a
distinct minority of special interest groups and others looking to suck on the
public teat.
As a person is he admirable? No. But should one’s persona be
given more weight than their actual abilities? I have met a lot of people who
were very good at their jobs but had not so likable personalities. And I have
seen the opposite; smooth talkers who really had no substance. Thus I learned a
long time ago to not put much measure in that particular aspect of the person.
George W. Bush, to put it simply isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer but he
surrounded himself with a very capable cabinet outside of the war monger Dick
Cheney. Thus other than the Iraq fiasco he really didn’t do that bad a job. Can
Trump do better? Depends a lot on the people who he selects for his cabinet. Only
time will really tell.
A very troublesome aspect of the full election cycle though
is how so much of the media is populated by “reporters” who, as pointed out
above, tried to tell people how to think. I especially find it also a real
shame that the vast majority of comedians out there are making the same error of
treating their audience as if they are ignorant fools. The full political
spectrum provides ample material for a good comedian who can use sarcasm,
satire, hyperbole or other tools of humour to sneak through the armour of
closed mindedness. The late great George
Carlin really held no political favourites although conservatives easily gave him ready fodder, like being against abortion as
all lives matter yet favouring the death penalty.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I don't want to live in a bubble so if you have a different take or can suggest a different source of information go for it!